Do Coaches Give Advice?

There has been a long running and enthusiastic discussion on the “Coaching at Work” thread on LinkedIn, the business networking site, and it would seem that this debate has raged in coaching training and lots of other professional forum and is as old as coaching itself (older if you include counselling in the mix).

All coaches want to do the very best for their clients and many have very different thoughts, feelings and practice relating to advice. The debate has often been pretty heated which indicates that there is a lot at stake. It may well be the case that questions of advice, and the ability and willingness to give it, may be at the heart of coaching. I think that I also spotted a theme where coaches wanted to be non-directive and regretted the times that they had stepped outside this to give advice – this struck me as something of a shame, the examples of advice-giving provided seemed perfectly understandable

I am what could best be described as a Solution Focused Coach and therefore believe myself to be non-directive in the way I understand that definition. In writing this piece I wanted to come up with a way of thinking about this question which I hope is even-handed and practical.

Can we agree on this?

There’s the first prickly matter of defining what we are talking about. Defining coaching is notoriously difficult and I don’t want to derail the reader at such an early stage. I’d like to start the discussion with a statement which I don’t think will alienate too many coaches and it is this – “people are more convinced about what comes out of their own mouths than out of anyone else’s”. It seems to me that coaching is a particular success when coachees develop their own solutions to their own aspirations and needs. Mainly because these solutions can be more easily adapted into how the client already does things and therefore they may be more likely to be adopted and to endure.

Coaching techniques may differ but I hope that we can agree that the central ideas are as follows.

Coaches ask question to help coachees get what they want. This “getting” usually takes the form of internal monologue (thinking), external dialogue (talking) and activities which take place between sessions. Coaches encourage people to find out and act and there is something important in this process coming from the coachee themselves. Like all ideals this may not always happen in practice but can we agree that this what we are aiming for?

The temptation/imperative for advice giving is therefore considered in the light of the ideal that people coaching helps people to find their own way to get what they want.

When is it always really good idea to give advice?

  • When coaching is really management. There are signs that the case for coaching is being won in organisations with more companies training their managers in coaching skills. However in many cases so much of the management role is letting people know what they should be doing and fine tune. Managers who are involved in coaching staff will need to be aware of the distinction
  • When coaching is really mentoring. New people, often in senior roles, learning from the experience of more experienced colleagues or others in the sector.
  • When there is a standard and accepted way of doing something – i.e. structuring a CV, writing and delivering a formal address of thanks.
  • When there is a mechanical solution to a problem – i.e. re-booting computer, replacing fuel pump
  • When there is an urgent need for intervention – a clients health condition is serious, a coachee is talking about their work in such a way as to seriously damage their career and wellbeing
When might it sometimes be a good idea to give advice?

  • During a long period of coaching involvement someone is investing heavily in the coachee’s development. Where in the coach’s opinion some advice may shorten the coaching period or produce significantly better or quicker results for the coachee.
  • When people are directly asking for it. Or indeed begging for it. Coaches may be advised to try and try with their facilitative approach first if they wish to aspire for the ideal.
  • When efforts to find a solution are painful and agonising for the client and some suggestions may open up new avenues of inquiry. 
  • When there has been an earlier agreement that there will be a combination of coaching and more direct instruction during the work. Care to be taken in indicating the transition otherwise the coachee may become more concerned with the agreement of the coach than what’s best for them. 

What kind of advice is best?

  • Information offered as just that, information. “Some people think….”, or it has been my experience that”, “I don’t know if you have read the guidance written by….” Or I read somewhere that….”
  • Advice which includes appreciative feedback of the client – i.e. “you have strengths in area A which you could apply to area B”
  • That offer a range of options to the client, allowing them to consider widely and therefore be able to adopt one as their own
  • Where coachees are signposted to additional material – books, websites which may help with the goals the coachee has identified
  • When the coach is absolutely confident that the client wants it. Asking “can I give you some advice” is likely to be responded to with a yes but does not constitute the best interest of the client.
  • Where processes are offered rather than solutions. Asking if coachee’s would like to take away a particular coaching exercise to help their thinking
What kind of advice to avoid?

  • Advice which implies direct or indirect criticism of the client
  • “You should do this” – unless the role is directive which I would suggest isn’t coaching
  • Advice which responds to the coaches’ judgement – positive or negative – about the client rather than what they need
  • The advice which serves the needs of the coach above that of the client. Beware coaches if you hesitate when asking yourselves “is this my favourite story?”, “does this make me look/sound good?”

 The danger areas

  • The coach thinking that they know what’s best. Thankfully people are different and therefore have different solutions to the challenges they face. Once a coach get’s into her or his head what would be the best course of action they may find themselves straying from the discussion or even disagreeing albeit silently with the coachees plan.
  • Aligned to the above there is a danger that coaches may be “waiting to speak rather than listening”
  • Developing a “map” of the client, thinking that you know what they’ll do next, developing a sense of approval or disapproval which may effect how you work and draw the coach into a focus on content and not the coaching process.
  • Asking questions which are actually really advice. “Have you ever thought of losing weight?” (I was actually asked this by a career coach) Not everything with a question mark at the end is a question.
  • Using metaphors, stories, perspectives which are actually advice – nothing wrong with advice if it fits. However I think it’s an idea to be clear ourselves what we are doing.
  • Believing that giving advice is always adding value. “Niche” coaches or advisors using a coaching element of their approach need to know that there is some danger in introducing their own ideas which may divert the coachee.
  • Failing to acknowledge the power relationship in coaching. This can be there for a number of reasons and take a number of forms. In such circumstances coachees may be vulnerable to more easily taking or looking for advice from their coach. Coaches need to consider this when asking “would you mind if I give you some advice?”
  • In business it generally pays to be an expert. It is easier to demonstrate expertise in a particular area – qualification, past roles, experience etc – than in a process which happens in the coaching relationship and often in the coachee’s head and heart. This is much more difficult to sell.

Summary

Coaching is primarily about process rather than content. Unless it is specifically requested, contracted or advertised, coaches should be careful about giving advice as it may hinder the “ideal” of coaches finding their own solutions.

It’s hard to for the coach to be present whilst not reach their own conclusions. I have heard the ability to observe and not judge to be the highest form of human intelligence.

Where coaching is “mixed” with advising or mentoring it needs to be labelled as such. Coachees may need to be helped to identify which process is which and be helped to differentiate. Coaches/advisors need to demonstrate acceptance of rejection of their advice.

Ultimately the choice should hinge on what works best. We need to be careful about what works best in the session against what works best in the longer term.

Coaching attracts confident people who have made considerable efforts towards their own development. Coaches (me included) need to be cautious of the “verve of the converted”. There is considerable virtue in valuing the coachee’s expertise in what they want and how they work.

Phil Jones 4th October 2010

 

« Previous Page

Workplace Mediation

Unhappy workplace relationships interfere with your ability to get things done and risk formal action. Workplace mediation can bring about good solutions for everyone

Take a look at how I work

Team Facilitation

Your greatest assets are your staff. With team facilitated sessions I can enable you to access untapped resources. Help your people find their motivation and use these to deliver more for the business.

Find out more

Support for Managers

Specialising in building staff engagement and better relationships, I can provide training and coaching for your managers on how to get the best out of, and for, your staff.

find out more